Cinema Counts: The Computational Turn and Quantitative Methods in Film Studies

Miłosz Stelmach

milosz.stelmach@gmail.com
Jagiellonian University (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-7121

Abstract

The aim of this text is a critical analysis of current developments and potential applications of quantitative methods in film studies. Within its scope, a concise reconstruction of the methodological foundations, historical development, and key achievements of statistical, experimental, and digital humanities tools in relation to audiovisual media research is conducted. This involves a review of the phenomena that have developed so far as well as a philosophical consideration of the sources, consequences, and potential limitations of quantitative thinking in an area traditionally occupied by the humanities. Quantitative methods are not considered here as a replacement for existing paradigms, but rather as their complement, extension, and often inspiration. This allows to understand the current transformations but also integrate them with traditional research approaches, and identify the pitfalls and difficulties associated with this paradigm shift.


Keywords:

quantitative methods, digital humanities, computational turn, film studies, data-driven humanities

Berry, D. (2011). The Computational Turn: Thinking about the Digital Humanities. Culture Machine, 12, pp. 1-22.
  Google Scholar

Bordwell, D. (2018). On the History of Film Style (2nd ed.). Madison: Irvington Way Press.
  Google Scholar

Brown, W. (2015). Politicizing Eye-Tracking Studies of Film. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media, 25.
  Google Scholar

Crosby, A. W. (1997). The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society. 1250-1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050518   Google Scholar

Davies, T., Frank, M. (2013). “There’s No Such Thing as Raw Data”: Exploring the Sociotechnical Life of a Government Dataset. In: WebSci’13: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (pp. 75-78). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2464464.2464472   Google Scholar

Dimitriados, G. (2021). Considering Eye-Tracking as a Validation Tool in Cinema Research. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, 20, pp.129-150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ausfm-2021-0018   Google Scholar

Gitelman, L. (ed.). (2013). “Raw data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge: MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001   Google Scholar

Gray, J. (2016). “Let Us Calculate!”: Leibniz, Llull, and the Computational Imagination. PublicDomainReview.org. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/let-us-calculateleibniz-llull-and-the-computational-imagination/
  Google Scholar

Han, B. (2018). The Expulsion of the Other: Society, Perception and Communication Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  Google Scholar

Hunter, A. (2014). Digital Humanities as Third Culture. MedieKultur, 57, pp. 18-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v30i57.16318   Google Scholar

Jockers, M. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252037528.001.0001   Google Scholar

Jones, D. B. (1942). Quantitative Analysis of Motion Picture Content. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 6 (3), pp. 411-428.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/265562   Google Scholar

Manovich, L. (2020). Cultural Analytics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11214.001.0001   Google Scholar

Moretti, F. (2013). Distant Reading. London – New York: Verso.
  Google Scholar

Roth, C. (2019). Digital, Digitized, and Numerical Humanities. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34 (3), pp. 616-632.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy057   Google Scholar

Snow, C. P. (1961). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3057748   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2024-10-01

Cited by

Stelmach, M. (2024) “Cinema Counts: The Computational Turn and Quantitative Methods in Film Studies”, Kwartalnik Filmowy, (127), pp. 6–28. doi: 10.36744/kf.2934.

Authors

Miłosz Stelmach 
milosz.stelmach@gmail.com
Jagiellonian University Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-7121

Research and Teaching Assistant in film studies at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków. Editor-in-chief of the film magazine Ekrany. His main research interests are cinematic modernism, cinema of Eastern Europe, and transformations of contemporary arthouse cinema.



Statistics

Abstract views: 149
PDF downloads: 110


License

Copyright (c) 2024 Miłosz Stelmach

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author grants the publisher a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY 4.0) to use the article in Kwartalnik Filmowy, retains full copyright, and agrees to identify the work as first having been published in Kwartalnik Filmowy should it be published or used again (download licence agreement). The journal is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. By submitting an article, the author agrees to make it available under this licence.

In issues from 105-106 (2019) to 119 (2022) all articles were published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence. During this period the authors granted a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY-ND 4.0) to use their article in „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, retained full copyright, and agreed to identify the work as first having been published in our journal should it be published or used again.