The Bergsonian Concept of Memory and Filmic Representations of Prosthetic Memory

Mirosław Przylipiak

mprzylipiak@gmail.com
University of Gdansk (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-8112

Abstract

Henri Bergson, in his work entitled Matter and Memory (1896), distinguished between two types of memory: cerebral and pure. Cerebral memory belongs to the body and is used to respond to stimuli, and therefore prefers those memories that are most useful in real life. Pure memory records everything that has happened, including memories that are useless in real life. Cerebral memory situates us on the side of the body and therefore biology. The tribute to useless memories is a hallmark of humanity and a precondition for spirituality. These statements by Bergson, popularized in Gilles Deleuze’s theory, turn out to be extremely relevant when characterizing cinematic representations of prosthetic memory, in which the film protagonists have memory implants or their memory is externalized. Bergson’s claims that memory is a distinctive feature of humanity, that there is a relationship between memory and the body, and finally that there is a division between practical and impractical memories, also remain valid in relation to these representations.

 


Keywords:

prosthetic memory, Henri Bergson, memory

Ansell-Pearson, K. (2010). Bergson on Memory. W: S. Radstone, B. Schwarz (red.), Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates (ss. 61-76). New York: Fordham University Press.
  Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (2006). Materia i pamięć. Esej o stosunku ciała do ducha (tłum. R. J. Weksler- -Waszkinel). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Zielona Sowa.
  Google Scholar

Burn, S. (2013). Mapping the Syndrome Novel. W: T. J. Lustig, J. Peacock (red.), Diseases and Disorders in Contemporary Fiction: The Syndrome Syndrome (ss. 35-52). London – New York: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (2008). Kino (tłum. J. Margański). Gdańsk: słowo/obraz terytoria.
  Google Scholar

DiGiovanna, J. (2015). Identity: Difficulties, Discontinuities and Pluralities of Personhood. W: M. Hauskeller, T. D. Philbeck, C. D. Carbonell (red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television (ss. 349-358). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137430328_35   Google Scholar

Frampton, D. (2006). Filmosophy. New York – London: Wallflower Press.
  Google Scholar

Front, S. (2023). „Spiders (…) Stringing Webs Through Her Head”: Representations of Memory in Anthony Doerr’s „Memory Wall” and Meredith Westgate’s „The Shimmering State”. Orbis Litterarum, 78 (6), ss. 537-555.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12402   Google Scholar

Groes, S. (2016). Introduction: Memory in the Twenty First Century. W: S. Groes (red.), Memory in the Twenty-First Century: New Critical Perspectives from the Arts, Humanities, and Sciences (ss. 1-13). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137520586_1   Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821686   Google Scholar

Jaynes, J. (1976). The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston – New York: A Mariner Book Houghton Mifflin Company.
  Google Scholar

Kołakowski, L. (1997). Bergson. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Landsberg, A. (1996). Prosthetic Memory: „Total Recall” and „Blade Runner”. W: M. Featherstone, R. Burrows (red.), Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk (ss. 175- -190). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250198.n10   Google Scholar

Landsberg, A. (2012). Pamięć protetyczna. W: I. Kurz, P. Kwiatkowska, Ł. Zaremba (red.), Antropologia kultury wizualnej. Zagadnienia i wybór tekstów (ss. 690-698). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  Google Scholar

Lanier, J. (2010). You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  Google Scholar

Lunceford, B. (2015). The Ghost in the Machine: Humanity and the Problem of Self- -Aware Information. W: M. Hauskeller, T. D. Philbeck, C. D. Carbonell (red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television (ss. 371-379). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137430328_37   Google Scholar

Pepperell, R. (2016). Neuroscience and Posthuman Memory. W: S. Groes (red.), Memory in the Twenty-First Century: New Critical Perspectives from the Arts, Humanities, and Sciences (ss. 330-333). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137520586_40   Google Scholar

Skalska, T. (2014). Pamięć protetyczna. W: M. Saryusz-Wolska, R. Traba (red.), Modi memorandi. Leksykon kultury pamięci (ss. 343-345). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  Google Scholar

Sobchack, V. (2004). Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520937826   Google Scholar


Published
2024-04-08

Cited by

Przylipiak, M. (2024) “The Bergsonian Concept of Memory and Filmic Representations of Prosthetic Memory”, Kwartalnik Filmowy, (125), pp. 6–29. doi: 10.36744/kf.2378.

Authors

Mirosław Przylipiak 
mprzylipiak@gmail.com
University of Gdansk Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-8112

Professor of film and media studies at the University of Gdansk, film critic, translator, documentary filmmaker. His main publications include the books Kino stylu zerowego [Zero Style Cinema] (1994, 2nd edition 2016), Kino najnowsze [New Cinema] (1998), Poetyka kina dokumentalnego [Aesthetics of Documentary Cinema] (2000, 2nd edition 2004), three books on American direct cinema, over 150 academic papers on various aspects of film and media, and numerous film reviews. He translated nearly 30 books, mostly from the fields of psychology and film, and some poetry. He also made several documentary films and educational television series. He was the founder and first managing director of Academic Educational Television at the University of Gdansk. He has been awarded many grants and fellowships, from the Fulbright Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and the Polish Ministry of Higher Education, among others. His main areas of interest are theory and aesthetics of cinema, documentary film, American direct cinema, and Polish cinema.



Statistics

Abstract views: 275
PDF downloads: 224


License

Copyright (c) 2024 Mirosław Przylipiak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author grants the publisher a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY 4.0) to use the article in Kwartalnik Filmowy, retains full copyright, and agrees to identify the work as first having been published in Kwartalnik Filmowy should it be published or used again (download licence agreement). The journal is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. By submitting an article, the author agrees to make it available under this licence.

In issues from 105-106 (2019) to 119 (2022) all articles were published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence. During this period the authors granted a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY-ND 4.0) to use their article in „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, retained full copyright, and agreed to identify the work as first having been published in our journal should it be published or used again.