“Nie sądzić” and “Wielki strach”: Two Short but Important Films

Sławomir Sikora

slawomir.sikora@uw.edu.pl
University of Warsaw (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-8543

Abstract

Recently, the term “non-memory” (which should not be equated with oblivion) has gained importance in the Polish discourse on memory. It seems that scholarly discussions analysing the issues of World War II and post-war experiences have been dominated by the language of psychoanalysis; however, it is worth taking into consideration also vernacular languages. The author discusses the issues of memory and non-memory in relation to the extremely traumatic post-war experiences depicted in the two short films Nie sądzić (Not to Judge, dir. Pawlina Carlucci Sforza and Magdalena Lubańska, 2017) and Wielki strach (The Fear, dir. Pawlina Carlucci Sforza, 2020). They deal with this issue from different perspectives: the first in a more indirect way, the second – directly. People returning from forced labour in Germany after World War II were plundered and murdered by a local gang in a forest near Przeworsk. Traumatic knowledge about these events had been hidden for over seventy years.


Keywords:

anthropology, Pawlina Carlucci Sforza, Magdalena Lubańska, vernacular language, Dębrzyna, memory, non-memory

Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing Against Culture. W: R. G. Fox (red.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, ss. 137-162.
  Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2010). Re-framing Memory. Between Individual and Collective Forms of Constructing the Past. W: K. Tilmans, F. van Vree, J. Winter (red.), Performing the Past: Memory, History, and Identity in Modern Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, ss. 35-50.
  Google Scholar

Chlebda, W. (2019). Wokół pojęć pamięć i забвение. Slavia Orientalis, (68) 4, ss. 681-698. DOI 10.24425/slo.2019.131156
  Google Scholar

Connerton, P. (2014). Siedem rodzajów zapomnienia. W: K. Kończal (red.), (Kon)teksty pamięci. Antologia. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury, ss. 343-357.
  Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1969). Społeczne ramy pamięci (tłum. M. Król). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  Google Scholar

Hirszowicz, M., Neyman, E. (2001). Społeczne ramy niepamięci. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 45 (3-4), ss. 23-48.
  Google Scholar

Kwiatkowski, P. T. (2009). Społeczne tworzenie zbiorowej niepamięci. W: L. M. Nijakowski (red.), Etniczność, pamięć, asymilacja. Wokół problemów zachowania tożsamości mniejszości narodowych i etnicznych w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, ss. 90-128.
  Google Scholar

Lubańska, M. (w druku). Perspektywa postsekularna w badaniach nie-miejsc pamięci. Przypadek powojennych mordów w podkarpackim lesie Dębrzyna. W: R. Sendyka, A. Janus, K. Jarzyńska, K. Siewior (red.), Nie-miejsca pamięci (2). Nekrotopologie. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
  Google Scholar

Marcus, G. (2003) Użyteczność kategorii uczestnictwa w zmieniających się kontekstach antropologicznych badań terenowych (tłum. J. Jaxa-Rożen). W: D. Wolska, M. Brocki (red.), Clifford Geertz – lokalna lektura. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, ss. 155-182.
  Google Scholar

Nycz, R. (2017). Kultura jako czasownik. Sondowanie nowej humanistyki. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
  Google Scholar

Rapport, N., Overing, J. (2000). Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. London-New York: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Rosaldo, R. (1986). From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor. W: J. Clifford, G. E. Marcus (red.), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press, ss. 77-97.
  Google Scholar

Sendyka, R. (2014) Miejsca, które straszą (afekty i nie-miejsca pamięci). Teksty Drugie, (1), ss. 84-102.
  Google Scholar

Sendyka, R. (2016). Niepamięć albo o sytuowaniu wiedzy o formach pamiętania. Teksty Drugie, (6), ss. 250-267. DOI: 10.18318/td.2016.6.14
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2016.6.14   Google Scholar

Stomma, L. (1979). Determinanty polskiej kultury ludowej XIX wieku. Polska Sztuka Ludowa, 33 (3), ss. 131-142.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-12-31

Cited by

Sikora, S. (2020) ““Nie sądzić” and ‘Wielki strach’: Two Short but Important Films ”, Kwartalnik Filmowy, (112), pp. 216–226. doi: 10.36744/kf.558.

Authors

Sławomir Sikora 
slawomir.sikora@uw.edu.pl
University of Warsaw Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-8543

PhD, Assistant Professor at the Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, University of Warsaw; his field of interest covers primarily visual and urban anthropology, and anthropology of contemporary culture. Author of the books Fotografia. Między dokumentem a symbolem [Photography: Between a Document and a Symbol] (2004) and Film i paradoksy wizualności. Praktykowanie antropologii [Film and the Paradoxes of Visuality: Practicing Anthropology] (2012), as well as numerous scientific articles. Co-author of the film Żeby to było ciekawe (Making It Interesting, 2009) and co-editor of the book Zanikające granice. Antropologizacja nauki i jej dyskursów [Vanishing Boundaries: Anthropologisation of Science and Its Discourses] (2009). Coordinator of several funded research projects, including Oddolne tworzenie kultury [Bottom-up Culture] and Obrazy różnorodności kulturowej i dziedzictwa [Images of Cultural Diversity and Heritage] (NAFA Film Festival, Warsaw 2015).



Statistics

Abstract views: 395
PDF downloads: 395


License

Copyright (c) 2020 Sławomir Sikora

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author grants the publisher a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY 4.0) to use the article in Kwartalnik Filmowy, retains full copyright, and agrees to identify the work as first having been published in Kwartalnik Filmowy should it be published or used again (download licence agreement). The journal is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. By submitting an article, the author agrees to make it available under this licence.

In issues from 105-106 (2019) to 119 (2022) all articles were published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence. During this period the authors granted a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY-ND 4.0) to use their article in „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, retained full copyright, and agreed to identify the work as first having been published in our journal should it be published or used again.