No Animals Were Used in the Making of This Film? Post-animals and the Call of Anthropomorphism in the Era of CGI

Kamil Kalbarczyk

donkamillo3@wp.pl
Jagiellonian University in Cracow (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-6275

Abstract

The article explores the impact of the digital revolution on animal representation in feature films. The author analyses computer-generated animals in the context of the progress of CGI and the effects of seamlessly compositing photorealistic animation with live action material. The author studies the phenomenon that has been developing since the 1990s in the context of visual effects studies and animal studies. He emphasizes the issue of progressive anthropomorphising of digital animals in the live action cinema of the last decade. The author differentiates three basic strategies for creating perceptually realistic animals, depending on the degree of their internal personification and external anthropomorphism or cartoonishness. Analysing The Lion King (dir. J. Favreau, 2019) the author notes a new trend, characteristic of hybrid cinema (a mélange of photorealistic animation and live action material): representations of deeply anthropomorphized fauna maintaining hyper-realistic physiognomy.


Keywords:

CGI, animals, digital animals, post-animals, anthropomorphism, digital revolution, visual effects, VFX, hybrid cinema

Berger, J. (1999). Po cóż patrzeć na zwierzęta (tłum. S. Sikora). W: J. Berger, O patrzeniu (ss. 5-39). Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
  Google Scholar

Bekoff, M. (red.) (2010). Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Santa Barbara, Denver, Oxford: ABC-CLIO.
  Google Scholar

DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Google Scholar

Dłużewicz, A. (2014). Etyka utylitarystyczna Petera Singera – szanse i możliwości przekształcenia praw zwierząt. Ethics in Progress, 5 (1), ss. 124-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2014.1.11   Google Scholar

Fudge, E. (2002). Animal. London: Reaktion Books.
  Google Scholar

Gregersdotter K., Hållén N., Höglund, J. (2015). A History of Animal Horror Cinema. W: K. Gregersdotter, N. Hållén, J. Höglund, (red.), Animal Horror Cinema: Genre, History and Criticism (ss. 19-36). Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Google Scholar

Jerolmack, C. (2013). The Global Pigeon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226001920.001.0001   Google Scholar

Kalbarczyk, K. (2017). W cyfrowym zwierciadle: CGI i postludzkie widma. Ekrany, 6 (40), ss. 30-37.
  Google Scholar

Kalof, L. (2007). Looking at Animals in Human History. London: Reaktion Books.
  Google Scholar

Keane, S. (2007). Cine Tech: Film, Convergence and New Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20955-8   Google Scholar

Lippit, A. M. (2000). Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar

Malamud, R. (1998). Reading Zoos: Representations of Animals and Captivity. New York: New York University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376403   Google Scholar

Manovich, L. (1998). What Is Digital Cinema?. W: N. Mirzoeff (red.), The Visual Culture Reader (ss. 405-416). London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

McLean, A. L. (2014). Afterword: Dogs at the Digital Divide. W: A. L. McLean (red.), Cinematic Canines. Dogs and Their Work in the Fiction Film (ss. 235-250). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  Google Scholar

Prince, S. (1996). True Lies: Perceptual Realism, Digital Images and Film Theory. Film Quarterly, 49 (3), ss. 27-37.
  Google Scholar

Prince, S. (2012). Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: The Seduction of Reality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  Google Scholar

Singer, P. (2007). Etyka praktyczna (tłum. A. Sagan). Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
  Google Scholar

Sobchack, V. (2000). Introduction. W: V. Sobchack (red.), Meta-Morphing: Visual Transformation and the Culture of Quick-Change (ss. xi-xxiii). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar

Stańczyk, M. (2019). Bestiariusz: historie przemocy. Ekrany, 2 (48), ss. 18-23.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-08-26

Cited by

Kalbarczyk, K. (2020) “No Animals Were Used in the Making of This Film? Post-animals and the Call of Anthropomorphism in the Era of CGI”, Kwartalnik Filmowy, (110), pp. 138–155. doi: 10.36744/kf.335.

Authors

Kamil Kalbarczyk 
donkamillo3@wp.pl
Jagiellonian University in Cracow Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-6275

A graduate of art history as well as film and new media studies at the Jagiellonian University. He is a doctoral student at the Institute of Audiovisual Arts there. Permanent collaborator of the Ekrany magazine. His main area of interest are issues related to the digital revolution and the so-called new ontology of film, as well as the subject of screen acting and stardom.



Statistics

Abstract views: 524
PDF downloads: 651


License

Copyright (c) 2020 Kamil Kalbarczyk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author grants the publisher a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY 4.0) to use the article in Kwartalnik Filmowy, retains full copyright, and agrees to identify the work as first having been published in Kwartalnik Filmowy should it be published or used again (download licence agreement). The journal is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. By submitting an article, the author agrees to make it available under this licence.

In issues from 105-106 (2019) to 119 (2022) all articles were published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence. During this period the authors granted a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY-ND 4.0) to use their article in „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, retained full copyright, and agreed to identify the work as first having been published in our journal should it be published or used again.