Władysław Skoczylas’s Trip to the USSR
Dariusz Konstantynów
d.konstantynow@ug.edu.plInstytut Historii Sztuki UG, Gdańsk (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-5677
Abstract
With the Soviet-Polish Non-Aggression Pact having been signed on 25 July 1932, there began a period of ‘rapprochement’ between the two countries, this resulting in e.g. a visit of a group of six Polish artists to Moscow and Leningrad (23 Nov. – 7 Dec. 1933). The group included: Władysław Jarocki, Władysław Skoczylas, Tadeusz Pruszkowski, Xawery Dunikowski, Władysław Daszewski, and Mieczysław Treter. Following the group’s return, it was only Władysław Skoczylas who publicly spoke about his impressions from the trip. He was most promptly associated with the Polish-Soviet ‘rapprochement’ in fine arts at the time: he most frequently spoke about art and organization of artistic life in the Soviet Union, he also actively participated in establishing relations with Soviet artists, and since he was a known and esteemed artist himself, also a President of the Institute of Art Propaganda, board member of the Society for Promoting Polish Art Abroad, and an active columnist affiliated with ‘Gazeta Polska’, an unofficial organ of the Polish government, his words resounded widely. The paper attempts to reconstruct the course of the visit of the Polish delegation, to analyse the report presented by Władysław Skoczylas in ‘Gazeta Polska’, as well as to answer the question why what he saw in the artistic life of the USSR was by him considered to have been one of the ‘strongest’ impressions he had had in the recent time. The encounter with Soviet art as well as becoming acquainted with the conditions in which Soviet artists lived and worked must have been an important experience for Władysław Skoczylas. In the Soviet Union he was able to see with his own eyes how the issues he himself had been considering as of the mid-1920s were solved, namely the mass character of art, its commitment to the life of the state and to the promotion of its ideology, functioning of the state and social patronage, organization of the artistic production and its sales, and finally the artists’ living conditions. Favourable interest with which he assessed what he saw during the visit to Moscow and Leningrad had by no means to do with his leftist inclinations. It resulted from Skoczylas’s deep conviction that the state, being the institution of the greatest potential and authority, also in the domain of art (particularly in the period of the deepest economic crisis) should take on the role of the main patron and client, providing artists with support, and treating them just like any other highly qualified specialist, while the artists should create art playing ‘a major role as a state-building factor’. The Soviet example illustrated what the implementation of the idea of art connected with the state and its ideology could look like, how art and the artists could benefit, yet it also showed the price of such an arrangement. Skoczylas does not provide an unequivocal answer to the question whether the price is worth paying. However, both his statements and the opinions voiced by representatives of other Polish artistic circle in the early 1930s suggest that they would be willing to incur the cost.
Supporting Agencies
Keywords:
Skoczylas Władysław (1883-1934), Polska-ZSRR – kontakty kulturalne 1918-1939, Polska – mecenat artystyczny państwa 1918-1939References
Balcerak, Wiesław, red. Polsko-radzieckie stosunki kulturalne 1918-1939. Dokumenty i materiały, Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza, 1977.
Google Scholar
Budurowycz, Bohdan B., Polish-Soviet Relations 1932-1939, New York-London: Columbia University Press, 1963.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/budu92350
Google Scholar
Chlenova, Masha, „Innovative, Polemical, Dogmatic. The Case of Soviet Experimental Museum Displays in 1930-1933.” W Curatorial Challenges. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Contemporary Curating, red. Malene Vest Hansen, Anne Folke Henningsen, Anne Gregersen, 223-36, London: Roultledge, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351174503-20
Google Scholar
Chlenova, Masha, „Soviet Museology During the Cultural Revolution: An Educational Turn, 1928-1933”, Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société. Revue électronique du Centre d'histoire de Sciences Po, 2017, nr 33: Image, Education and Communism in Germany and USSR in the 1920s and 1930s, red. Jérôme Bazin, Cécile Pichon-Bonin, Anastasia Simoniello, https://histoire-politique.fr/index.php?numero=33&rub=dossier&item=311 (dostęp 14 XI 2019)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/histoirepolitique.13074
Google Scholar
Chlenova, Masha, „Staging Soviet Art: 15 Years of Artists of the Russian Soviet Republic, 1932-33.” October 147 (2014): 38-55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/OCTO_a_00165
Google Scholar
Chmielewska, Agnieszka, W służbie państwa, narodu i społeczeństwa. „Państwowotwórczy” artyści plastycy w II Rzeczypospolitej, Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN, 2006.
Google Scholar
David-Fox, Michael, „From Illusory «Society» to Intellectual «Public»: VOKS, International Travel and Party-Intelligentsia Relations in the Interwar Period.” Contemporary European History, 11 (2002): 7-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777302001029
Google Scholar
David-Fox, Michael, Showcasing the great experiment. Cultural diplomacy and western visitors to the Soviet Union, 1921-1941, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794577.001.0001
Google Scholar
Konstantynów, Dariusz, „On the Reception of Soviet Art in Poland in the 1930s.” Centropa, 1 (2010): 31-45.
Google Scholar
Malak, Kazimierz, Polsko-radzieckie stosunki kulturalne w okresie międzywojennym, Warszawa: Akademia Obrony Narodowej, 1991.
Google Scholar
Materski, Wojciech, Na widecie. II Rzeczpospolita wobec Sowietów 1918-1943, Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN, 2005.
Google Scholar
Pogonowska, Ewa, Czytanie Nowej Rosji. Polskie spotkania ze Związkiem Sowieckim lat trzydziestych, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, 2012.
Google Scholar
Skoczylas, Władysław, „Sztuka w Z.S.R.R. I. Muzea i zbiory.” Gazeta Polska, 1933, nr 351, s. 3.
Google Scholar
Skoczylas, Władysław. „Sztuka w ZSRR. II. Malarstwo, rzeźba, grafika i architektura.” Gazeta Polska, 1933, nr 356, s. 3.
Google Scholar
Skoczylas, Władysław. „Sztuka w Z.S.R.R. III. Uczelnie, kooperatywy i stowarzyszenia.” Gazeta Polska, 1933, nr 358, s. 3.
Google Scholar
Skoczylas, Władysław, „Sztuka w ZSRR. IV. Wystawa Armii Czerwonej i propaganda.” Gazeta Polska, 1934, nr 6, s. 3.
Google Scholar
Skrzypek, Andrzej, Kronika koegzystencji. Zarys stosunków polsko-radzieckich w latach 1921-1939, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1985.
Google Scholar
Wasilewska, Diana, „Spory krytyczne międzywojnia. Wystawa plastyki radzieckiej w Warszawie (1933 r.) – wokół dyskusji o socjalizacji sztuki.” W „Spojrzenie z ukosa”. Literatura i kultura rosyjska w Polsce międzywojennej, red. Grażyna Pawlak, Anna Sobieska, 127-140, Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich, 2019.
Google Scholar
Wasilewska, Diana, Mieczysław Treter, Estetyk, krytyk sztuki oraz „szara eminencja” międzywojennego życia artystycznego w Polsce, Kraków: Universitas, 2019.
Google Scholar
Wisner, Henryk. Z historii stosunków kulturalnych polsko-radzieckich 1919-1939, Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN, 1987.
Google Scholar
Yankovskaya, Galina, „The Economic Dimension of Art in the Stalinist Era: Artists’ Cooperatives in the Grip of Ideology and the Plan.” The Slavic Review, 4 (2006): s. 769-791.
Google Scholar
Authors
Dariusz Konstantynówd.konstantynow@ug.edu.pl
Instytut Historii Sztuki UG, Gdańsk Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2064-5677
Statistics
Abstract views: 342PDF downloads: 295
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Instytut Sztuki PAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dariusz Konstantynów, What Did Not Władysław Strzemiński Write in the Autumn of 1934? , Biuletyn Historii Sztuki: Vol. 83 No. 1 (2021): numer zwykły